![]() This is wrong, as the sentence encompasses two separate concepts. Some editors understand the "anyone can edit" part of "the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit" as an extension of the word "free". "An encyclopedia that anyone can edit" does not refer to the legal or ethical right of any editor to contribute content supporting their own point of view. "Free Encyclopedia" does not mean "anyone can edit it however they like" ![]() Indeed, parts of Wikipedia were copied to optical media (such as DVD) and printed on paper, and these copies were distributed for money.įurthermore, it is forbidden to upload to Wikipedia any content whose copyright terms allow only non-commercial use, as this is not compatible with the meaning of "free" as defined by CC-BY-SA and GFDL. The CC-BY-SA and GFDL licenses allow charging money for distributing content that they cover. This, however, does not mean that Wikipedia content is fully non-commercial. In practice, any person who has access to the World Wide Web may read the content of Wikipedia on the website without paying any money. "Free Encyclopedia" does not mean "zero price encyclopedia" Some of these meanings happen to apply to Wikipedia in whole or in part, but they do not necessarily reflect the intention of Wikipedia's existence and must be precisely understood. Since we also mean "gratis" as a secondary meaning, that can be used. We mean primarily the 2nd meaning, but it will depend on the particular language as to whether "libre access" is a concept which can be smoothly expressed. Wikipedia's co-founder Jimmy Wales said the following about the ambiguity of the English word "free":Į probably run into the problem of the word 'free' in English, which means both "gratis" (free of charge) and "libre" (liberty). Some people misunderstand the subtitle "the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit", often because of the different meanings of the word "free" in the English language. Wikipedias in some other languages, for example Spanish, do not allow "fair use" content at all and include nothing but free content. The only exception to this is that the English Wikipedia allows limited uploading of some images and media files under " fair use" terms see Wikipedia:Non-free content for details. ![]() If uploaded, such data will be promptly deleted. Uploading to Wikipedia of information whose copyright terms are not compatible with CC-BY-SA or GFDL is not allowed. Thus Wikipedia reverses the restrictive trend set by Mr. The goal of such licensing is producing reference material free to all people-a collection of human knowledge, which cannot be limited or controlled by restrictive use of copyright law and which, under most reasonable conditions, can be used and shared by everyone without any hindrance. Read the full text of the licenses for the precise legal terms. It mainly means that the rights on the text belong to its authors, but the text may be freely read, distributed and modified as long as the modified versions are distributed under the same licenses. Text is contributed to Wikipedia under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA) and the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL)- copyleft licenses for free content. The word "Free" in "The Free Encyclopedia" refers first and foremost to the licensing terms of Wikipedia's content. The English word "free" has several meanings.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |